Irving v. Doe

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Irving v. Doe

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

LUKE IRVING, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-23-329-SLP ) JOHN DOE, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

O R D E R

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 5] of United States Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green entered May 24, 2023. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted. 1 Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiff has waived further review of all issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation. See Moore v. United States,

950 F.2d 656, 659

(10th Cir. 1991); see also United States v. 2121 E. 30th St.,

73 F.3d 1057, 1060

(10th Cir. 1996).

1 The Court’s docket reflects that the Report and Recommendation was returned as “undeliverable” on June 12, 2023. Plaintiff is responsible for providing notice of any change of address to the Court. See LCvR 5.4(a) (requiring written notice of a change of address and further providing that papers sent by the Court are “deemed delivered if sent to the last known address given to the court.”); see also Theede v. United States Dep’t of Labor,

172 F.3d 1262

, 1267-68 (10th Cir. 1999) (pro se plaintiff who failed to provide any change of address waived right to review of report and recommendation by failing to make a timely objection). Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED in its entirety. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with a court order and pay the filing fee. IT IS SO ORDERED this 30" day of June, 2023. bp SCOTT L. PALK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown