Hudson v. OCHA Office and Administration

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Hudson v. OCHA Office and Administration

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

DENISE L. THOMAS-HAWARD-HUDSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-23-703-SLP ) OCHA, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

O R D E R

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell entered September 7, 2023 [Doc. No. 5]. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or granted.1 Therefore, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Doc. No. 2] is DENIED and Plaintiff is directed to pay the full filing fee in the amount of $402.00 within twenty-one days from the date of this Order or this matter will be dismissed without prejudice.

1 The Court’s docket reflects that a previously filed Order [Doc. No. 4] was returned as “undeliverable” on September 8, 2023. Plaintiff is responsible for providing notice of any change of address to the Court. See LCvR 5.4(a) (requiring written notice of a change of address and further providing that papers sent by the Court are “deemed delivered if sent to the last known address given to the court.”); see also Theede v. United States Dep’t of Labor,

172 F.3d 1262

, 1267-68 (10th Cir. 1999) (pro se plaintiff who failed to provide any change of address waived right to review of report and recommendation by failing to make a timely objection). IT IS SO ORDERED this 27" day of September, 2023.

SCOTT L. PALK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown