Smith v. Wright

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Smith v. Wright

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

JASON MICHAEL SMITH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-24-482-J ) FNU WRIGHT, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER

Plaintiff, a federal pretrial detainee appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a Complaint under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents,

403 U.S. 388

(1971) alleging a correctional officer directed a racial slur towards him. [Doc. No. 1]. The matter was referred for initial proceedings to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell consistent with

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B), (C). Judge Mitchell screened the Complaint and issued a Report and Recommendation recommending dismissal without prejudice on grounds that (1) Plaintiff cannot state a valid claim for relief against a private correctional officer contracting with the federal government under § 1983, (2) Bivens has not been expanded to include a cause of action for racial slurs, and (3) even if Plaintiff could sue under either § 1983 or Bivens, the use of a racial slur, while inexcusable and offensive, does not amount to a constitutional violation. [Doc. No. 10]. Plaintiff did not object by his September 17, 2024 deadline and has therefore waived his right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation. See Casanova v. Ulibarri,

595 F.3d 1120, 1123

(10th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 10] and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint without prejudice. A separate judgment will enter. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9" day of October, 2024.

BERNARD M. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown