Morgan v. Biden
Morgan v. Biden
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-24-942-D ) JOE BIDEN, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) issued by United States Magistrate Judge Chris M. Stephens pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C) [Doc. No. 18]. Judge Stephens recommends a dismissal without prejudice of this action based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with prior orders directing him to pay $405.00 for filing and administrative fees.1 Plaintiff has neither filed a timely objection to the R&R nor requested additional time to object. Upon consideration, the Court finds that Plaintiff has waived further review of the issues addressed in the R&R. See Moore v. United States,
950 F.2d 656, 659(10th Cir. 1991); see also United States v. 2121 East 30th St.,
73 F.3d 1057, 1060(10th Cir. 1996).
1 Before this case was transferred to the Western District of Oklahoma, Judge John F. Heil, III of the Eastern District of Oklahoma denied Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. See 8/13/2024 Order [Doc. No. 7]. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the R&R [Doc. No. 18] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling. A separate judgment of dismissal shall be entered. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9" day of December, 2024.
\ ty Q □□□ TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown