UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

ANTHONY RAYMONÉ CLARK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-23-774-G ) DR. COLE et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER Plaintiff Anthony Raymoné Clark, a state prisoner appearing pro se, filed a Complaint (Doc. No. 1) and a Supplement thereto (Doc. No. 11) alleging deprivations of his constitutional rights against two defendants. In accordance with

(b)(1), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green for initial proceedings. On November 3, 2023, Judge Green issued a Report and Recommendation (“R. & R.,” Doc. No. 12), recommending that the dismissal of all claims. See

at 2-15 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915A). Plaintiff timely filed an Objection to the R. & R. See Doc. No. 14. Plaintiff also has filed a Motion to Supplement (Doc. No. 16), which the Court grants insofar as its contents have been considered together with Plaintiff’s Objection herein. Pursuant to controlling authority, the Court reviews de novo the portions of the R. & R. to which specific objections have been made. See United States v. 2121 E. 30th St.,

(10th Cir. 1996);

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Plaintiff's Objection and Supplement supply additional factual allegations to those already presented in the Complaint and considered by Judge Green. See Pl.’s Obj. at 1-4; Pl.’s Suppl. at 1-4. Nothing therein, or in Plaintiff's accompanying argument and exhibits, evinces any error in Judge Green’s findings or requires any modification to her conclusions. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Objection is overruled. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 12) is ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff's claims challenging the State’s jurisdiction, the validity of his state-court conviction, and the validity of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections’ policies, as well as his claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs claims for illegal search and seizure and for violation of procedural due process are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. No. 13) is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED as outlined herein. A separate judgment shall be entered. IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of April, 2024.

(Barba B. Kadota United States District Judge