GRAHAM v. BIDEN

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

GRAHAM v. BIDEN

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

JONATHAN GRAHAM, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) NO. CIV-24-0426-HE ) DAVID ROGERS, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER

Petitioner Jonathan Graham has filed a habeas corpus petition. Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B),(C), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield Green for initial proceedings. On May 24, 2024, Judge Green issued a Report and Recommendation recommending the court dismiss petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction as an unauthorized second or successive petition. Petitioner was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation, and he has filed a timely objection. On August 10, 2020, petitioner filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

in this court, challenging his Oklahoma County convictions. The court found the petition untimely and dismissed it. See Graham v. Pettigrew, No. CIV-20-828- G,

2022 WL 9497308

, at *2 (W.D. Okla. Oct. 14, 2022). Because he previously challenged his state convictions under § 2254 in this court, petitioner was required to obtain authorization from the Tenth Circuit to file this second/successive § 2254 habeas petition. See

28 U.S.C. § 2244

(b)(3)(A). Petitioner does not assert in either his petition or his objections that he obtained authorization from the Tenth Circuit to file his petition. Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #10] and DISMISSES petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction as an unauthorized second or successive petition. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 25th day of June, 2024. /] Tf i L/S JO XTON STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown