Robertson v. Muscogee Creek Nation

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Robertson v. Muscogee Creek Nation

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

RADIANCE ROBERTSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-00508-PRW ) MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER

On June 3, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5) in this action, in which she recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff Radiance Robertson’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 2). Judge Mitchell advised Robertson of her right to object to the Report and Recommendation by June 24, 2025, in accordance with

28 U.S.C. § 636

and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and that failure to make a timely objection would waive any right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation. To date, Robertson has filed no objections. She has therefore waived her right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation.1 Upon review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5) in full, DENIES Robertson’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 2), and ORDERS Robertson to pay the full $405.00 filing fee on or before July 30, 2025. The Court cautions Robertson that “[f]ailure to pay the filing fees by the date specified, to seek

1 United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop.,

73 F.3d 1057

, 1059–60 (10th Cir. 1996). a timely extension within which to make the payment, or to show cause in writing by the date specified for payment shall be cause for dismissal of the action without prejudice to refiling.”” IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of July 2025.

PATRICK R. WYRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

See LCvR3.3(e).

Reference

Status
Unknown