Haywood v. Walker
Haywood v. Walker
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DEMAURY HAYWOOD, ) Plaintiff, Vv. Case No. CIV-24-1075-J FNU WALKER, et al., Defendants. ORDER Plaintiff, a federal pre-trial detainee appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Amanda L. Maxfield for initial proceedings consistent with
28 U.S.C. § 636. [Doc. No. 4]. On June 12, 2025, Judge Maxfield issued a Report and Recommendation recommending the Court dismiss Plaintiffs case without prejudice to re-filing based upon his failure to submit the paperwork necessary for service in accordance with the Court’s order. [Doc. No. 22]. Plaintiff was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by July 3, 2025. No objection has been filed. Plaintiff has therefore waived any right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues in the Report and Recommendation. See Moore v. United States,
950 F.2d 656, 659(10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 22] and DISMISSES this case without prejudice to re-filing. IT IS SO ORDERED this 18" day of July, 2025.
TUDE mM. BERNARD M. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown