IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

JAMES EZELL III, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-934-D ) TERRENCE CRAWFORD, et al., ) ) Respondents. )

ORDER Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Amanda L. Maxfield’s Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 8] filed pursuant to

(b)(1)(B)-(C). Upon initial screening of Petitioner’s Complaint [Doc. No. 1], Judge Maxfield recommends dismissal in its entirety without prejudice for failure to comply with the Court’s order to cure deficiencies. The case file shows no timely objection to the Report nor request for an extension of time, even though Petitioner was expressly informed of his right to object, the deadline for doing so, and the firm waiver rule. See Moore v. United States,

(10th Cir. 1991). Therefore, the Court finds that Petitioner has waived further review of all issues addressed in the Report. See id.; see also United States v. 2121 E. 30th St.,

(10th Cir. 1996). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 8] is ADOPTED in its entirety. Petitioner’s action against Respondents is dismissed without prejudice. A separate judgment shall be entered accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 2] is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED this 22™ day of October, 2025.

Nd Q. TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI Chief United States District Judge