FOIRN TTHHEE WUNEISTTEEDR NST DAITSETSR DICISTT ORFI COTK CLOAUHROTM A JEREMY WILLIAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-932-PRW ) FNU RAINEY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER On September 23, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5), recommending the Court dismiss the complaint (Dkt. 1) without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to follow the Court’s rules and orders. Plaintiff was advised that he had a right to object to the Report and Recommendation by October 14, 2025, in accordance with

and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and that failure to make a timely objection would waive any right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5). No objections have been filed as of this date. Having failed to object, Plaintiff has accordingly waived his right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5).1 Upon review of the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5), the Court:

1 United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop.,

, 1059–60 (10th Cir. 1996); Moore v. United States,

(10th Cir. 1991); cf.

(b)(1) (requiring a district judge to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made” but otherwise permitting a district judge to review the report and recommendations under any standard it deems appropriate). (1) ADOPTS in full the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 5) issued by the Magistrate Judge on September 23, 2025; and (2) DISMISSES the complaint without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of November 2025.

PATRICK R. WYRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE