Manuel Espinoza Delgado v. Russell Holt, et al.

United States District Court, Oklahoma Western

Manuel Espinoza Delgado v. Russell Holt, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

MANUEL ESPINOZA DELGADO, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-1342-D ) RUSSELL HOLT, et al., ) ) Respondents. )

ORDER Petitioner Manuel Espinoza Delgado filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

. [Doc. No. 1]. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell for initial proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). [Doc. No. 3]. On November 22, 2025, Respondents filed a notice informing the Court that Petitioner applied for voluntary departure and was transported to Mexico on November 20, 2025. [Doc. No. 8]. On November 25, 2025, Judge Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation (“R and R”) recommending the Court dismiss as moot the Petition because the Petitioner is no longer in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The case file shows no timely objection to the R and R nor request for an extension of time, even though Petitioner was expressly informed of his right to object, the procedure for doing so, and the consequences of failing to object. Therefore, the Court finds that Petitioner has waived further review of all issues addressed in the R and R. See Moore v. United States,

950 F.2d 656, 659

(10th Cir. 1991); see also United States v. 2121 East 30th Street,

73 F.3d 1057, 1060

(10th Cir. 1996). For the reasons explained by Judge Mitchell in the R and R, the Court finds this action should be dismissed as moot. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the R and R [Doc. No. 10] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is DISMISSED AS MOOT. A separate judgment of dismissal shall be entered. IT IS SO ORDERED this 17" day of December, 2025.

\ ty Q □□□ TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI Chief United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown