Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel, 2004

Judicial Ethics Opinion 2004-3

Judicial Ethics Opinion 2004-3
Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel · Decided October 27, 2004 · Bailey, Simms, Viee, Craig
2004 OK JUD ETH 3; 99 P.3d 1234; 2004 Okla. LEXIS 109; 2004 WL 2399530
Judicial Ethics Opinion 2004-3

Opinion of the Court

QUESTION: May a judge charge a reasonable fee for performing a wedding after court hours outside of the courthouse?

ANSWER: No

DISCUSSION:

Canon 4 D. Financial Activities.

(1) A judge should not engage in financial dealings that:
(a) may reasonably be perceived to exploit the judge's judicial position, or ..."

Personal retention of payment for performing a marriage is an exploitation of judicial office for personal gain. But for the judge's judicial status, the judge would not have the legal capacity to perform a legally binding marriage ceremony.

/s/ Robert L. Bailey, Chairman /s/ Robert D. Simms, Viee Chairman /s/ Milton C. Craig, Secretary

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.