Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel, 2018

In re Judicial Ethics Op. 2018-9

Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel · Decided November 21, 2018

434 P.3d 18 (Pacific Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Associate District Judge-Elect will begin his term January 14, 2019. He is currently and has been for several years, a member of the Board of Commissioners for the Housing Authority of a Sovereign Tribal Nation. The Tribal Housing Authority was created by Oklahoma Statute and is exclusively federally funded. The Board is made up of five members with general oversight responsibilities. Judge-elect time requirements are minimal and he receives a per diem and expense check each month. He has enjoyed his service on the Trial Board and would like to continue after his judicial term begins.

Opinion of the Court

¶2. QUESTION

Will the Associate District Judge-Elect continued participation on the Tribal Housing Board cause ethical concern?

¶3. ANSWER

Yes

¶4. DISCUSSION

Canon 3 Rule 3.4 states as follows:

"a judge should not accept appointments to governmental committees, boards, commissions or other governmental positions unless it is one that concerns the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice, or the Judge has the specific approval of the Supreme Court."

Associate District Judge-Elect would violate Canon 3, Rule 3.4 unless approval of the Supreme Court is obtained.

/s/ Honorable Edward C. Cunningham, Chairman

/s/ Honorable William C. Hetherington

/s/ Honorable Thomas Landrith

/s/ Honorable Allen McCall

/s/ Honorable April Sellers White

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.