Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1895

McMurtry v. County Commissioners

McMurtry v. County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided September 6, 1895 · Scott, Burford, Mc-Atee
55 P. 1069; 6 Okla. 60; 1896 OK 57; 1896 Okla. LEXIS 5

McMurtry v. County Commissioners

Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Scott, J.:

This action was commenced in the district court of Roger Mills county by J. W. McMurtry, as county attorney, and as a citizen and taxpayer, on behalf of himself and other taxpayers of said county, to restrain W. P. Francis, C. B. Howerton and J. B. Freeman, county commissioners, A. G. Gray, county clerk, and W. W. Owens, county treasurer of said county, from issuing bonds of said county for the payment of certain warrants alleged to been issued and drawn, before any assessment of the taxable property of said county was ever had, for the reason that said warrants were then illegal and void. A temporary restraining order was issued *61 by Hon. Jno. L. Burford, presiding judge, wbicb was afterwards made perpetual by Justice McAtee, successor to Justice Burford in that jurisdiction.

The only distinction between this case and that of Hoffman v. County Commissioners, 3 Okla., 325, is, that Roger Mills county is embraced in the territory opened to settlement under the act of congress approved March 3, 1891, opening the Cheyenne and Arapahoe Indian Reservation to settlement, and the warrants involved were issued in Roger Mills county before an assessment was had, and were held not to be valid and binding obligations against said county, and in the case of Hoffman v. County Commissioners, supra, the warrants were issued in Pawnee county before an assessment was had, and were held to be valid obligations of said county, and Pawnee county is embraced in the territory opened to settlement under the act of March 3, 1893, opening the Cherokee Outlet and Pawnee and Tonkawa Indian Reservations.

The reasoning in the case cited is applicable to the case now before us, and upon the reasoning of that case, the judgment of the lower court must be reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Burford, J., and Mc-Atee, J., not sitting.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.