Sauers v. Tate

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sauers v. Tate, 54 P. 452 (Okla. 1898)
7 Okla. 211; 1898 OK 80; 1898 Okla. LEXIS 22
McAtee

Sauers v. Tate

Opinion of the Court

Opinion pf the court by

McAtee, J.:

No briefs have been filed in this cause, and since it is provided in the rules of practice in this court (rule 4, 5 Okla., v.) that “counsel shall file ten printed briefs in each case,” and by rule 6, “In each civil case, counsel for plaintiff in error shall furnish a copy of his brief,” etc., and, “in case of the failure to comply with the requirements of this1 rule, the court may continue, or dismiss the case, or affirm or reverse the judgment,” the case will therefore be dismissed for failure to file briefs in the case in compliance with the rule.

All of the -Justices concurring.

Reference

Full Case Name
P. Sauers v. John P. Tate Et Al.
Status
Published
Syllabus
Appeal — Dismissal. Cause dismissed for failure to' file brieis in compliance with the rule of the court. (Syllabus by the Court.)