Sauers v. Tate
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sauers v. Tate, 54 P. 452 (Okla. 1898)
7 Okla. 211; 1898 OK 80; 1898 Okla. LEXIS 22
McAtee
Sauers v. Tate
Opinion of the Court
Opinion pf the court by
No briefs have been filed in this cause, and since it is provided in the rules of practice in this court (rule 4, 5 Okla., v.) that “counsel shall file ten printed briefs in each case,” and by rule 6, “In each civil case, counsel for plaintiff in error shall furnish a copy of his brief,” etc., and, “in case of the failure to comply with the requirements of this1 rule, the court may continue, or dismiss the case, or affirm or reverse the judgment,” the case will therefore be dismissed for failure to file briefs in the case in compliance with the rule.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- P. Sauers v. John P. Tate Et Al.
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Appeal — Dismissal. Cause dismissed for failure to' file brieis in compliance with the rule of the court. (Syllabus by the Court.)