Endicott v. Ellis
Endicott v. Ellis
Opinion of the Court
Said demurrer was by the court overruled, to which the defendant excepted. Defendant then filed his answer to said amended and supplemental petition. Thereafter plaintiff filed his reply to defendant's answer. Afterwards, on the 5th day of October, 1898, said cause came on for trial before the court, whereupon proceedings were had, and evidence given. Upon said trial, hearing, and consideration of said cause, the court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, to which the defendant excepted. Thereafter, and within the time allowed by law, the defendant filed his motion for a new trial, which motion was by the court overruled, to which the defendant excepted. From which judgment and rulings of the court the defendant appeals and brings the cause here for review.
Opinion of the court by The facts in this case contained, and the principles of law herein involved, are practically the same as those involved in the case of E. F. Black v. Walter P. Jackson, decided in this court, February 12, 1898, and reported in volume 6, page 751, Oklahoma Reports, and as the views therein expressed, and the law therein laid down, meet with our approval, the rule there established will be followed in this case, and the judgment of the district court affirmed.
Hainer, J., having presided in the court below, and McAtee, J., not sitting; all of the other Justices concurring. *Page 668
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Geo. P. Endicott v. Herbert E. Ellis and Sam Lee
- Status
- Published