Manning v. United States

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Manning v. United States, 78 P. 92 (Okla. 1904)
14 Okla. 604; 1904 OK 105; 1904 Okla. LEXIS 119
Burwell, Gillette

Manning v. United States

Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

The appellant was convicted of disposing of intoxicating liquors to Indians. He appeals to this court, and prays a reversal of the judgment and sentence. He has filed no briefs. If there is any error in the record it is his duty to point it out to the court. An appellate court will not search for error, and our attention has been ■called to none.

The judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed, •and it is ordered that it be carried into execution at the cost ■of the appellant.

Gillette, J., who presided in the court below, not sitting; all the other Justices concurring.

Reference

Full Case Name
Tom Manning v. the United States
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
•CRIMINAL LAW — Error Must be Pointed Out — Failure to File Briefs. An appellate court will not search for error, but it is the duty of one appealing', even in a criminal case, to direct the attention of the appellate court to the particular errors complained of. (Syllabus by the Court.)