Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908

Utterback v. Rock Island Plow Co.

Utterback v. Rock Island Plow Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided September 16, 1908 · Dunn, Hates, Kane, Turner, Williams
97 P. 649; 22 Okla. 263; 1908 OK 197; 1908 Okla. LEXIS 26

Counsel

Wm. Stacey, for plaintiff in error. Barefoot Carmichael, for defendant in error.

Utterback v. Rock Island Plow Co.

Opinion of the Court

Hates, J.

A motion to dismiss has been filed by defendant in error in which he alleges several grounds for dismissal. One ground alleged is that no writ of error was sued out by plaintiff in error within six months from the date of the entry of the judgment in the trial court. Under the rule announced by this court in Edward Porter et al. v. Eck E. Brook, 21 Okla. 885. 97 Pac. 645, and in H. K. Bickford v. Stanley R. Bruce et al. 21 Okla. 892, 97 Pac. 648 the motion to dismiss in this case should be sustained upon this ground, and it is unnecessary to notice the other grounds set out in the motion.

The motion to dismiss is sustained

Williams, C. J., and Dunn, Kane and Turner, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.