No brief was filed in this cause within the time required by rule 7 of this court (¿0 Okla. vii); and, although an extension of ninety days has been granted and expired, plaintiff in error has yet filed no brief. It follows, upon the authority of Horner et al. v. Goltry & Sons, 23 Okla. 905, that defendant in error’s motion to dismiss should be sustained, and it is so .ordered.