Julius Spiro & Co. v. Bibb
Julius Spiro & Co. v. Bibb
117 P. 199; 27 Okla. 780; 1911 OK 33; 1911 Okla. LEXIS 52
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McFarland (Okla. 1912)
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Toney (Okla. 1912)
- Cox v. Warford (Okla. 1912)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
A transcript of the proceedings of the lower court was filed in this court on June 16, 1910. No brief has been made and served by plaintiffs in error, as required by rule 7. On September 17, 1910, defendant in error moved to dismiss said appeal for failure to comply with said rule. Neither has any response been made to said motion, nor any application for leave to file typewritten briefs.
The motion to dismiss is sustained.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.