Maddin v. McCormick
Cases that cite this one
19 later published cases cite this decision.
- Johnston v. Marsee (Okla. 1914)
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Canadian County (Okla. 1914)
- Lillard v. Hyatt (Okla. 1912)
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rath (Okla. 1912)
- Dewey v. Nix (Okla. 1912)
- State v. Billingsley (Okla. 1912)
- Wheeler v. Dolak (Okla. 1912)
- Bender v. Bender (Okla. 1911)
- Farmers' Bankers' Warehouse Ass'n v. Burt (Okla. 1911)
- McClelland v. Witherall (Okla. 1911)
- Edwards v. Rutland Savings Bank (Okla. 1938)
- State v. Weatherford Milling Co. (Okla. 1913)
- Miller Lumber Co. v. Swink Mercantile Co. (Okla. 1913)
- Ledbetter v. Kimsey (Okla. 1912)
- Rice v. Jones (Okla. 1912)
- First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. Baldwin (Okla. 1912)
- Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber (Okla. 1912)
- Hill v. Riddle (Okla. 1912)
- Cox v. Rogers (Okla. 1911)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The petition in error and case-made attached were filed in this court May 4, 1910. On November 4, 1910, defendants in error filed motion to dismiss the appeal on the following grounds:
(1) Case-made not served in time.
(2) Petition in error not filed in time.
(3) No brief filed pursuant to rule 7 of this court.
No response has been made to said motion to dismiss.
It ,is not essential to pass on the first two grounds, as the third ground is sufficient, the plaintiff in error neither having filed his brief in accordance with said rule 7 nor having made application for additional time or for permission to file typewritten briefs. Leavitt et al. v. Commercial Nat. Bank, 26 Okla. 164, 109 Pac. 71; Monnington v. Cotteral, 26 Okla. 817, 110 Pac. 632; Cooper v. Chapman, 26 Okla. 600, 110 Pac. 722.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.