Cox v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Cox v. Rogers, 119 P. 205 (Okla. 1911)
30 Okla. 296; 1911 OK 461; 1911 Okla. LEXIS 457
Brewer
Cox v. Rogers
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court on November 12, 1909. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the case. The petition in error shall therefore be dismissed for want of prosetion. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 Pac. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, infra, 119 Pac. 205; Bender v. Bender et al., infra, 119 Pac. 205.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- COX v. ROGERS Et Al.
- Cited By
- 12 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Briefs — Dismissal. Where the plaintiff in error files no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for waut of prosecution. (Syllabus by Brewer, C.)