Bank of Taft v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma November 14, 1911

Bank of Taft v. Thompson, 119 P. 124 (Okla. 1911)

29 Okla. 683; 1911 OK 355; 1911 Okla. LEXIS 360

Kane, Turner, Dunn, Hayes, Williams

Opinion of the Court

KANE, J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon motion of the defendants in error to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the plaintiff in error has failed to observe rule 7 of this court (30 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) in not filing briefs within the required time. An examination of the record shows, that the plaintiff in error is in default in regard to filing briefs, although the time for doing so has expired.

' The motion to dismiss must be sustained.

TURNER, C. J., and DUNN and HAYES, JJ., concur; WILLIAMS, J., absent.

Reference

Full Case Name: BANK OF TAFT v. THOMPSON Et Al.
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published
Syllabus: APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal—Failure to File Briefs. Dismissed for failure to file briefs within, the time limited by rule 7 of the Supreme Court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pao. vi). (Syllabus by the Court.)