Lawless v. Pitchford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma November 14, 1911

Lawless v. Pitchford, 126 P. 782 (Okla. 1911)

33 Okla. 633; 1911 OK 404; 1912 Okla. LEXIS 764

Williams, Turner, Hayes, Kane, Dunn

Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, J.

Rule 25 of this court (20 Okla. xii, 95 Pac. viii) provides in part as follows:

“The brief shall contain the specifications of the errors complained of, separately set forth and numbered; the argument and authorities in support of each point relied on, in the same order.”

The brief of the plaintiff in error in no respect complies with the provisions of said rule.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

TURNER, C. J., and HAYES, KANE, and DUNN, JJ„ concur.

Reference

Cited By: 6 cases
Status: Published
Syllabus: APPEAL AND ERROR — Brief—Effect of Defects. Rule 25 of this court (20 Oída, xii, 95 Pac. viii) provides: “The brief shall contain the specifications of the errors complained of, separately set forth and numbered; the argument and authorities in support of each point relied on, in the same order.” Held, that, where the brief does not substantially comply with this provision, the appeal will be dismissed. (Syllabus by the Court.)