Lawless v. Pitchford
Lawless v. Pitchford
126 P. 782; 33 Okla. 633; 1911 OK 404; 1912 Okla. LEXIS 764
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ball v. Hall (Okla. 1916)
- Indian Land & Trust Co. v. Widner (Okla. 1913)
- Worrell v. Fellows (Okla. 1913)
- McDonald Coal Co. v. Equitable Powder Manufacturing Co. (Okla. 1913)
- Cherry v. Boyles (Okla. 1931)
- Cox v. Kirkwood (Okla. 1916)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Rule 25 of this court (20 Okla. xii, 95 Pac. viii) provides in part as follows:
“The brief shall contain the specifications of the errors complained of, separately set forth and numbered; the argument and authorities in support of each point relied on, in the same order.”
The brief of the plaintiff in error in no respect complies with the provisions of said rule.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.