Yeager v. Shelton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Yeager v. Shelton, 119 P. 983 (Okla. 1911)
29 Okla. 667; 1911 OK 454; 1911 Okla. LEXIS 353
Turner

Yeager v. Shelton

Opinion of the Court

TURNER, C. J.

This being, as it is, an original proceeding by petition filed in this court March 25, 1911, by P. J. Yeager, against the defendants, “as and constituting the county election board of Tulsa county,” praying a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring said board and its secretary to accept and file petitioner’s nominating petition and place his name upon the official ballot to be used at an election to be held April 4, 1911, as an independent candidate for mayor of said city, the writ will not issue, and said petition is dismissed, for the reason that the time for holding said 'election having passed, the questions of law presented have become purely abstract or hypothetical, from a determination of which no practical results can flow. Reece v. Cheney et al., 28 Okla. 501. It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
YEAGER v. SHELTON Et Al.
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
APPEAL AND ERROR — Abstract Questions — Dismissal. Where, on account of the lapse of time, the questions raised on an original proceeding in mandamus become abstract or hypothetical and disconnected from the granting of any actual relief, or from the determination of which no practical results can flow, the 'case will not be determined by this court, but will be dismissed. (Syllabus by the Court.)