This case presents error from the district court of Kay county. September 28, 1906, plaintiff in error, as plain-iiff, filed his petition against the defendant in error, as defendant, and Earnshaw & Kevan, as partners, for the purpose of foreclosing a subcontractor’s lien. A stipulation has been filed by the parties in this court, agreeing that the judgment rendered in the case of Christy v. Union Oil & Gas Co., ante, 114 Pac. 740, shall be the judgment rendered in this case; the only difference being in the amount recovered, should recovery be had. It follows therefore, and in accordance therewith, that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.