Ledbetter v. Kimsey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Ledbetter v. Kimsey, 128 P. 1086 (Okla. 1912)
39 Okla. 282; 1912 OK 639; 1913 Okla. LEXIS 497
Robertson
Ledbetter v. Kimsey
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
This appeal was filed in this court December 8, 1910. Neither party has filed a brief; nor has there been any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- APPEAL AND ERROR — Briefs—Failure to File. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 (20 Okla viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. (Syllabus by Roberrtson, C.)-