Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912

Lorenson v. J. H. Conrad & Co.

Lorenson v. J. H. Conrad & Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided January 9, 1912 · Kane
129 P. 732; 35 Okla. 406; 1912 OK 47; 1912 Okla. LEXIS 593

Lorenson v. J. H. Conrad & Co.

Opinion of the Court

KANE, J.

There is a motion to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled cause, upon the ground, among others, “that the case-made was not served upon the defendant in error or its counsel within three days after the motion for a new trial was overruled, as provided by law, and was not served upon the defendant in error or its counsel within the extension of time granted *407 by the trial court for the plaintiffs in error to prepare and serve the case-made.”

The record shows that the case-made was not served until three days after the expiration of the. time granted by the court to the plaintiffs in error to prepare and serve the case-made upon the defendant in error or its counsel. That is a sufficient ground for dismissal.

The appeal is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.