Rice v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma May 14, 1912

Rice v. Jones, 124 P. 67 (Okla. 1912)

32 Okla. 734; 1912 OK 404; 1912 Okla. LEXIS 325

Rosser

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court March 9, 1910. Plaintiffs *735 in error have failed to file brief in the case. Petition in error should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 2 7 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; Bender v. Bender, 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Reference

Full Case Name: RICE Et Al. v. JONES Et Al.
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published
Syllabus: APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal—Failure to File Brief. Where plaintiff in error flies no brief, as required by rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. (Syllabus by Rosser, 0.)