First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. Baldwin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. Baldwin, 127 P. 260 (Okla. 1912)
34 Okla. 825; 1912 OK 624; 1912 Okla. LEXIS 496
Robertson
First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. Baldwin
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
This appeal was filed in this court December 22, 1910. Neither party has filed a brief, nor has there been any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therfore, be dismissd for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Reference
- Cited By
- 8 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. (Syllabus by Robertson, O.)