Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rath

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rath, 124 P. 59 (Okla. 1912)
32 Okla. 857; 1912 OK 313; 1912 Okla. LEXIS 351
Brewer

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rath

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court on July 6, 1910. The plaintiff 'in error has failed to file any brief in the case. Th§ petition in error shall therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 Pac. 200; McC lelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
Syllabus
APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Briefs. Where-plaintiff in error files no brief as required by rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pae. vi) of this court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. (Syllabus by Brewer, 0.)