Opinion by

The motion for new trial in this case was overruled on December 11th, and sixty days were al *115 lowed within which to serve the case-made. The case-made was served on February 11th. No extension of time was procured, and therefore the case was not served within the time fixed by the court. We cannot therefore consider errors not appearing on the record proper, and, as none of the errors assigned arise on the record proper, the case should be affirmed.

By the Court: .It is so ordered.