Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 127 P. 260 (Okla. 1912)
34 Okla. 759; 1912 OK 648; 1912 Okla. LEXIS 478
Robertson
Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
This appeal was filed in this court November 21, 1910. Neither party has filed a brief, nor *760 is there any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; Bender v. Bender et at., 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Reference
- Cited By
- 8 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal—Filing of Brief. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rulé 7 of this court (20 Oída. viii, 95 Pac. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. (Syllabus by Robertson, 0.)