Hill v. Riddle
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Hill v. Riddle, 128 P. 112 (Okla. 1912)
36 Okla. 122; 1912 OK 726; 1912 Okla. LEXIS 822
Robertson
Hill v. Riddle
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
This appeal was filed in this court November 22, 1910. No brief has been filed by either-party, and it is evident that the appeal has been abandoned. The petition in error should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error bas filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 OMa. viii, 95 Pae. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. (Syllabus by Robertson, C.)