Hukill v. Tharp

Supreme Court of Oklahoma November 19, 1912

Hukill v. Tharp, 128 P. 113 (Okla. 1912)

36 Okla. 178; 1912 OK 728; 1912 Okla. LEXIS 836

Sharp

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court January 9, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have filed no brief; nor have they asked for an extension of time in which to prepare and file brief. It will therefore be considered that the appeal has been abandoned; and the petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; Rice et al. v. Jones et al., 32 Okla. 734, 124 Pac. 67; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rath, 32 Okla. 857, 124 Pac. 59.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Reference

Full Case Name: HUKILL Et Al. v. THARP Et Al.
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published
Syllabus: APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Briefs. Where plaintiffs in error file no brief, as required by rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pae. vi) of this court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. (Syllabus by Sharp, C.)