Hukill v. Tharp
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court January 9, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have filed no brief; nor have they asked for an extension of time in which to prepare and file brief. It will therefore be considered that the appeal has been abandoned; and the petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; Rice et al. v. Jones et al., 32 Okla. 734, 124 Pac. 67; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rath, 32 Okla. 857, 124 Pac. 59.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.