Snow v. Frye

Supreme Court of Oklahoma October 15, 1912

Snow v. Frye, 127 P. 422 (Okla. 1912)

34 Okla. 826; 1912 OK 651; 1912 Okla. LEXIS 497

Robertson

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This appeal was filed January 3, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have filed no brief, nor has any excuse been offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissd for want of prosecution under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered. •

Reference

Full Case Name: SNOW Et Al. v. FRYE Et Al.
Cited By: 7 cases
Status: Published
Syllabus: APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Briefs — Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. (Syllabus by Robertson, 0.)