Jordon v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.
Jordon v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
This appeal is prosecuted by-case-made. A motion for new trial was filed on December 12,. 1910. The record fails to show when this motion was acted upon. The case-made was served on opposing counsel April. 19, 1911. The record is not certified as a transcript.
The record before us failing to affirmatively show that the' case-made was served within three days after final judgment,, or within an extension of time properly allowed by the court, the same is a nullity and presents nothing for this court to review. The cause is dismissed. Com’rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173, 92 Pac. 152; Bettis v. Cargile, 23 Okla. 301, 100 Pac. 436; Lankford v. Wallace, 26 Okla. 857, 110 Pac. 672; Carr v. Thompson, 27 Okla. 7, 110 Pac. 667; Lathim v. Schlack, 27 Okla. 522, 112 Pac. 968; Willson v. Willson, 27 Okla. 419, 112 Pac. 970; McCoy v. McCoy, 27 Okla. 371, 112 Pac. 1040; School District v. Cox, 27 Okla. 459, 112 Pac, 1041; First Nat. Bank v. Oklahoma Nat. Bank, 29 Okla. 411, 118 Pac. 574; Bettis v. Cargile, 34 Okla. 319, 126 Pac. 222.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jordon v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.
- Status
- Published