Vanselous v. McClellan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Vanselous v. McClellan, 131 P. 172 (Okla. 1913)
35 Okla. 505; 1913 OK 126; 1913 Okla. LEXIS 109
PER CURIAM.

Vanselous v. McClellan

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

On December 24,1907, defendant in error, John E. McClellan, sued Thomas Vanselous and James Ham *506 ilton, plaintiffs in error, in the district court oí Kay county, in ejectment for certain lots described in his petition. There was trial and judgment for plaintiff, and when a second trial which was granted resulted the same way, defendants bring the case here. But we cannot pass upon the merits of this cause, but must dismiss it. This for the reason that, owing to a failure of plaintiffs in error to comply with rule 25 (.20 Okla. xii, 95 Pac. viii) of this court and set forth in their brief a specification of errors complained of, we can only conjecture what is relied upon to reverse the case. Cause dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
VANSELOUS Et Al. v. McCLELLAN
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
APPEAL AND ERROR — Review—Briefs—Requisites—Dismissal. When plaintiff in error in his brief fails to comply with rule 25 (20 Okla. xii, 95 Pac. viii) of this court, his appeal may be dismissed. (Syllabus by the Court.)