Hill v. City of Kingfisher

Supreme Court of Oklahoma November 18, 1913

Hill v. City of Kingfisher, 136 P. 775 (Okla. 1913)

39 Okla. 782; 1913 OK 656; 1913 Okla. LEXIS 587

Robertson

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This appeal was filed in this court October 14, 1911. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution tinder rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 95 Pac. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 Pac. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 Pac. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 Pac. 216; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 Pac. 260; M., O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 Pac. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 Pac. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 Pac. 422.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Reference

Status: Published
Syllabus: APPEAL AND EEEOE — Brief—Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Olda. vi, 95 Pac. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. (Syllabus by Eobertson, C.)