Moore v. Adams
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Tulsa Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Co. v. E. E. Tuttle & Son (Okla. 1916)
- Hoyt Shoe Co. v. Cuff (Okla. 1915)
- Oriental Cement Plaster Co. v. Roman Nose Gypsum Co. (Okla. 1915)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This cause comes on to be heard on motion of defendant in error to affirm the judgment of the trial court. There judgment was rendered against plaintiff in error for a certain sum, whereupon he superseded the same and commenced proceeding in error in this court. As counsel for plaintiff in error has not complied with that part of our rule 25 (38 Okla. x, 95 Pac. viii) which requires:
“The brief of the plaintiff in error in all cases except felonies shall contain an abstract or abridgment of the transcript, setting forth the material parts of the pleadings, proceedings, facts and documents upon which he relies, together with such other statements from the record as are necessary to a full understanding of the questions presented to this court for decision, so that no examination of the record itself need be made in this court”
—the judgment of the court below is affirmed. Berry v. Woodward et al., 38 Okla. 468, 133 Pac. 1127; McKain v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co., 35 Okla. 164, 128 Pac. 895; Merchants’ & Planters’ Ins. Co. v. Crane et al., 31 Okla. 713, 123 Pac. 1126.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.