Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Martin, Mayor v. Glass

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Martin, Mayor v. Glass, 134 P. 51 (Okla. 1913)
39 Okla. 59; 1913 OK 474; 1913 Okla. LEXIS 455
Rosser

Martin, Mayor v. Glass

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

The transcript in this case was filed July 31, 1911. The plaintiffs in error have filed no brief. The petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Farmers' & Bankers’ Warehouse Association v. Burt, 30 Okla. 326, 120 Pac. 296, and cases there cited.

• By the Court: It is so ordered.

Reference

Full Case Name
MARTIN, Mayor, Et Al. v. GLASS
Status
Published
Syllabus
APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal—Want of Prosecution. Where plaintiff in error files no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. (Syllabus by Rosser, C.)
↑