Thompson v. Yount

Supreme Court of Oklahoma November 18, 1913

Thompson v. Yount, 136 P. 592 (Okla. 1913)

39 Okla. 783; 1913 OK 673; 1913 Okla. LEXIS 588

Robertson

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

This appeal was filed in this court October 16, 1911. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 95 Pac. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 Pac. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 Pac. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 Pac. 216; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 Pac. 260; M., O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 Pac. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 Pac. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 Pac. 422.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Reference

Status: Published
Syllabus: APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 95 Pac. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of proseeuiton. (Syllabus by Robertson, 0.)