Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913

Napier v. Dilday

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided June 10, 1913 · Williams

132 P. 1085; 38 Okla. 365; 1913 OK 388; 1913 Okla. LEXIS 376

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Conterez v. O'DONNELL (Okla. 2002)
Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. Borelli (Okla. Civ. App. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, J.

The record shows that the finding made against the plaintiffs in error, upon which the judgment was rendered, was with the consent of their counsel. Consent ends all contention between the parties,- and there is nothing to- review on appeal. Baker v. Van Ness et al., 37 Okla. 122, 130 Pac. 536; Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co., 28 Ore. 9, 40 Pac. 406, 1014, 52 Am. St. Rep. 759, and authorities therein cited. ■

The proceeding in error is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.