Miles v. Bird
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Davis (Okla. 1952)
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Clark (Okla. 1926)
- Graham v. Kay (Okla. 1923)
- Loughbridge v. Tynes (Okla. 1923)
- Congher v. Mahan (Okla. 1923)
- New State Telephone Co. v. Scahill (Okla. 1923)
- Dickson v. Taylor (Okla. 1923)
- Merchants Southwest Transfer & Storage Co. v. Woodruff (Okla. 1923)
- In re Gardner's Estate (Okla. 1917)
- Walker v. Robinson (Okla. 1917)
- United Talking Machine Co. v. Swindle (Okla. 1917)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
This appeal by case-made was filed in this court February 27, 1912. The plaintiff in error filed brief on May 29, 1912. The defendant in error has not filed a brief, and has given no reason for not doing so.
We have examined the errors assigned in the brief for plaintiff in error, and the record upon which they are predicated, and *429 the grounds urged for reversal appear to be well taken. In such situation we are not required to search the record, or to hunt for authorities, to find some theory upon which the judgment may possibly be sustained. Butler v. McSpadden, 25 Okla. 465, 107 Pac. 170; Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469, 106 Pac. 957; Buckner v. Oklahoma Nat. Bank, 25 Okla. 472, 106 Pac. 959; Reeves & Co. v. Brennan, 25 Okla. 544, 106 Pac. 959; Sharpleigh Hdw. Co. v. Pritchard, 25 Okla. 808, 108 Pac. 360; Butler v. Stinson, 26 Okla. 216, 108 Pac. 1103; School Dist. v. Shelton, 26 Okla. 229, 109 Pac. 67, 138 Am. St. Rep. 962; Flanagan v. Davis, 27 Okla. 422, 112 Pac. 990; M., K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Long, 27 Okla. 456, 112 Pac. 991; Phillips v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 99, 118 Pac. 371; Doyle v. School Dist., 30 Okla. 81, 118 Pac. 386; Bank of Grove v. Dennis, 30 Okla. 70, 118 Pac. 570; Hawkins v. White, 31 Okla. 118, 120 Pac. 561; Rudd v. Wilson, 32 Okla. 85, 121 Pac. 252; Reynolds-Davis & Co. v. Hotchkiss, 31 Okla. 606, 122 Pac. 165; First Nat. Bank v. Blair, 31 Okla. 562, 122 Pac. 527; Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Co. v. Patterson, 30 Okla. 113, 120 Pac. 933.
The cause should be reversed and remanded for a nery trial.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.