Spaulding v. Yarbrough

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Spaulding v. Yarbrough, 140 P. 782 (Okla. 1914)
40 Okla. 731; 1914 OK 206; 1914 Okla. LEXIS 131
Russell

Spaulding v. Yarbrough

Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, J.

This case was filed in this court on May 8, 1913, and presents error from the district court of Muskogee county. Since the plaintiffs in error filed their appeal in this court the controversies involved appear to have been fully sp* tied, as is shown by a certified copy of deed to the land involvse, properly executed, by Jennie L. Yarbrough (joined by W. T,. Yarbrough), plaintiff below,'who asserted claims to said land, the said deed being to Jqsie C. Spaulding as grantee. This land was the sole matter at issue. The motion to dismiss this appeal made by the attorneys of defendant in error sets forth the *732 execution of said deed on the 24th day of December, 1913, and accompanying affidavit of George C. Beidleman, one of the attorneys for defendant in error, alleges that he served the motion to dismiss this appeal, to which this, affidavit is attached, on the plaintiffs in error in said action on the 7th day of April, 1914-, by depositing in the postoffice at Okmulgee, Oklahoma, a true copy of said motion addressed to Bailey & Wyand, attorneys for plaintiffs in error, addressed to them at Muskogee, Oklahoma, with postage prepaid. This affidavit and motion to dismiss the appeal was filed in this court on April 8, 1914. Up to this time there has been made no answer or counter showing. The controversy having thus been determined, the rule announced by this court in Smith v. Boatman, 29 Okla. 818, 120 Pac. 599, is applicable.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained.

All the Justices concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
SPAULDING Et Al. v. YARBROUGH
Cited By
6 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
APPEAL AND ERROR — Settlement of Controversy — Dismissal. Where, prior to the determination of a proceeding in error in this court, it is made to appear by defendant in error that the controversy has been settled and determined, and the showing thereof which has been ■ duly served is undenied by plaintiff in error, the proceeding will be dismissed. (Syllabus by the Court.)