Davis v. Vaughn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Davis v. Vaughn, 148 P. 137 (Okla. 1915)
46 Okla. 158; 1915 OK 229; 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1126
Rittenhouse
Davis v. Vaughn
Opinion of the Court
The petition in error and the transcript of the record in the ease was filed in this court on September 30, 1912, Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned.
The petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 Pac. 1155.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- DAVIS Et Al. v. VAUGHN Et Al.
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal—Failure to File Brief. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. (Syllabus 'by Rittenhouse, C.)