Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915

Schuck v. Moore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Decided June 29, 1915 · Opinion by DEVEREUX, C. (after stating the facts as above).

150 P. 461; 48 Okla. 533; 1915 OK 519; 1915 Okla. LEXIS 664

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

Willitt v. ASG Industries, Inc. (Okla. 1978)
Poindexter v. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. (Okla. Civ. App. 1976)
Anderson v. Stevenson (Okla. 1929)
Carson v. State Ex Rel. Dudley (Okla. 1929)
Thomas v. Morgan (Okla. 1928)
News-Dispatch Printing & Audit Co. v. Board of Com'rs (Okla. 1928)
Merchants Southwest Fireproof Warehouse Co. v. Johnston (Okla. 1925)
Lillard v. Meisberger (Okla. 1925)
Bulfinch v. Schatz (Idaho 1923)
Board of Com'rs of Mayes County v. Vann (Okla. 1916)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The petition in error and appeal must be dismissed. It has repeatedly been held by this court that, where the record fails to contain a copy of the final order or judgment sought to be reviewed, and in which it is not made to appear that the same is of record in the trial court, no question is presented to this court for its determination, and the appeal will be dismissed. Sproad v. Durland, 7 Okla. 230, 54 P. 458; Dennyv. Wright, 13 Okla. 256, 74 P. 104; Ford v. McIntosh,22 Okla. 423, 98 P. 341; Meadors v. Johnson, 27 Okla. 543,117 P. 198; Brown v. Territory, 15 Okla. 362, 82 P. 647;Kansas City, M. O. Ry. Co. v. Fain, 34 Okla. 164,124 P. 70.

We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered. *Page 535

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.