Dodder v. Washita Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dodder v. Washita Lumber Co., 151 P. 679 (Okla. 1915)
51 Okla. 25; 1915 OK 614; 1915 Okla. LEXIS 924
Opinion by McKEOWN, C.

Dodder v. Washita Lumber Co.

Opinion of the Court

Opinion- by

McKEOWN, C.

This court will examine the transcript of the record, and case-made, to ascertain its jurisdiction; and .when there appears a purported jour-; nal entry of judgment in the case-made, and a recitation that an order was made extending time to make and serve case-made, and the purported journal entry of judgment is not shown to have been filed by the clerk of the court, or entered in the journal of the court, and no order extending time to make and serve case-made being set out in the case-made, or shown to have been filed, or entered on the journal by the clerk of the trial court, this does not present anything to this court for decision, and a purported order of the trial judge extending time in which to make and serve a case-made is without force, when the case-made fails to show affirmatively that such order was made and entered. Town of Okemah v. Allen, 48 Okla. 757, 150 Pac. 669.

We recommend that this cause be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
Syllabus
APPEAL AND ERROR — Presentation for Review — Dismissal—Case-Made — Time to Make and Serve — Extension. Where, in a case-made, there appears, a purported journal entry of judgment, and a recitation that an order was made extending time to make and serve case-made, and the purported journal entry of judgment does not appear to have been filed by the clerk of the .court, or entered in the court journal, and the case-made or transcript of the record does not contain the order extending time to make- and serve case-made, and show that same has been filed with the clerk of the court, or entered in the journal, nothing is presented to this court for decision, and the cause will be dismissed. (Syllabus by McKeown, C.)