Thomas v. First Nat. Bank of Roff

Opinion by

This case wlas docketed in this court on July 23, 1913, and was submitted on Sep *373 tember 13, 1915. No briefs have been filed by the plaintiff in error, no additional time asked within which to file briefs, and no ■ excuse offered for failure to comply with rule 7 (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). We have examined the record, and the judgment appears to be correct.

We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.