Phillips v. Hackler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Phillips v. Hackler, 153 P. 863 (Okla. 1915)
49 Okla. 586; 1915 OK 1087; 1915 Okla. LEXIS 90
Kane
Phillips v. Hackler
Opinion of the Court
This cause comes on to be heard upon a motion to dismiss, filed by the defendant In error upon the following ground:
“The judgment rendered herein is a joint judgment in favor of Mary Hackler against three defendants, Sam Dane, Chas. A. Phillips, and Victor C. Phillips. The de *587 fendants Chas. A. Phillips and Victor C. Phillips filed motion for new trial, which was overruled and time given in which to serve case-made. No case-made was ever served on the defendant Sam Dane. There is no showing of service on Sam Dane and no waiver by him. This renders the case-made void; and, since this is an appeal by case-made, there is nothing for, the court to consider, and hence the same should be dismissed.”
This contention seems to be well taken. It is supported by National Surety Co. v. Oklahoma Presbyterian College, 38 Okla. 429, 132 Pac. 652, cited by the movants, and by many other cases.
The motion to dismiss is sustained.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- PHILLIPS Et Al. v. HACKLER
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- APPEAL AND ERROR — Appeal From Joint Judgment — Necessary Parties — Service of Case-Made. All parties to a joint judgment must be joined in a proceeding in error in this court, either as plaintiffs in error or as defendants in error, before such judgments can be reviewed; and where a review of the judgment is sought by means of a petition in error and case-made, service of the case-made within the time prescribed by the statutes must be had against all parties who do not join in the appeal as plaintiffs in error, but who are made parties thereto as defendants in error. (Syllabus by the .Court.)